Wednesday, March 11, 2009
Daniel's artwork on display March 27th
Please come out and show your support!
Sunday, February 15, 2009
A quick fix of Transhumanism
Here is Wikipedia's introduction to their article on Transhumanism:
Transhumanism is an international intellectual and cultural movement supporting the use of science and technology to improve human mental and physical characteristics and capacities. The movement regards aspects of the human condition, such as disability, suffering, disease, aging, and involuntary death as unnecessary and undesirable. Transhumanists look to biotechnologies and other emerging technologies for these purposes. Dangers, as well as benefits, are also of concern to the transhumanist movement.[1]
The term "transhumanism" is symbolized by H+ or h+ and is often used as a synonym for "human enhancement".[2] Although the first known use of the term dates from 1957, the contemporary meaning is a product of the 1980s when futurists in the United States began to organize what has since grown into the transhumanist movement. Transhumanist thinkers predict that human beings may eventually be able to transform themselves into beings with such greatly expanded abilities as to merit the label "posthuman".[1] Transhumanism is therefore sometimes referred to as "posthumanism" or a form of transformational activism influenced by posthumanist ideals.[3]
Transhumanist foresight of a transformed future humanity has attracted many supporters and detractors from a wide range of perspectives. Transhumanism has been described by one critic, Francis Fukuyama, as the world's most dangerous idea,[4] while one proponent, Ronald Bailey, counters that it is the "movement that epitomizes the most daring, courageous, imaginative, and idealistic aspirations of humanity".[5]
The link for that article can be found at: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Transhumanism
There's the World Transhumanist Association at: http://www.transhumanism.org/index.php/WTA/index/
There's Dresden Codak (http://www.dresdencodak.com/), a wonderful Transhumanist web comic, and their discussion forum: http://forums.koalawallop.com/viewforum.php?f=14&sid=802a750f24f84acd759605743551b79e
These are all good starting points for gaining more knowledge on what Transhumanism is and what Transhumanists strive to do and be.
-Daniel
Wednesday, January 28, 2009
Time travelling Trans-humanist band seeks experienced musicians
And now, the ad:
Are The Residents, King Crimson, David Bowie, Led Zeppelin, Siouxsie and the Banshees, Queen, The Boredoms, Van Morrison, John Zorn, and Rush on your recreational aural stimulator?
Are you on a waiting list list for sweet bionic enhancements?
Are you a skilled musician and composer (no drummers or vocalists, thanks, we're set on those)?
Then we've got the band for you!
H+ is the world's first trans-humanist band. We're eating the boundaries that limit modern music and regurgitating the future of rock.
We're looking for someone who's equally at home playing atonal alternative to the poppiest punk.
We want to meet twice a week and are about as serious as you can be about totally rocking the future.
Bonus points if you're a ninja.
Tuesday, January 20, 2009
Transhumanism and Romanticism
In one sense this is true, transhumanism is very much a rational philosophy. I would argue, however, that man's struggle to break through the limitations of his mortal coil is essentially romantic.
Transhumanism does not seek to remove emotion from the human experience. I believe expanding our perception and knowledge can only lead to new emotions heretofore unknown to the human condition.
Some fear that to change our current condition would be to cease being essentially human. I argue that the only essentially human trait is the progress towards greater life and understanding. This is man's enduring quest and what makes him romantic.
With H+ I hope to capture and express the joy and heartbreak of humanity not only as we know him today, but as we might know him tomorrow.
-Andy
Monday, January 19, 2009
Time travelling Trans-Humanist band seeks experienced guitarist
Are The Residents, King Crimson, David Bowie, Led Zeppelin, Siouxsie and the Banshees, Queen, The Boredoms, John Zorn, and Rush on your recreational aural stimulator?
Are you on a waiting list list for sweet bionic enhancements?
Are you a skilled guitarist and composer?
Then we've got the band for you!
H+ is the world's first trans-humanist band. We're eating the boundaries that limit modern music and regurgitating the future of rock.
We're looking for someone who's equally at home playing atonal alternative to the poppiest punk.
We want to meet twice a week and are about as serious as you can be about totally rocking the future.
Bonus points if you're a ninja.
Thursday, January 15, 2009
You're doing it all wrong
I actually do have a larger objection to Beamz beyond its terrible promotional video, and I will get back to that shortly.
I've also come across something that really pisses me off. This isn't just a bad video (although what you're about to see is almost unwatchable, and is NOT a parody), but it's the entire principle behind it. Take a look for yourself;
Part of what we're trying to do with H+ is make music creation more accessible and intuitive. But we still want the creative process to be solely in the hands of the people with ideas. This program, Microsoft Songsmith, teaches young people that the best way to make music is to let other people do it for you. And that, to me, is a problem. There have been great artists who never wrote a single line of their own material, such as Frank Sinatra. But he always had talented songwriters working on music, most of it tailored directly to him. Now we have a revolving door of singers who don't stay in the limelight unless they do something outrageous and embarrassing (see: Britney Spears). This program is pretty much the dumbed-down version of what happens at a Britney Spears session. The person with no talent (in this case, it literally could be you!) is molly-coddled and led to think they're actually contributing. Meanwhile, their voice is manipulated and placed against generic backing tracks. Throw in some annoying lyrics and you've got a hit single.
Now, let me jump back to Beamz for a minute. If you watch the video, the people "playing" the beams aren't really hitting notes. They're simply breaking the beams for either short or long amounts of time. The instrument plays back a pre-recorded loop that is independent of the person. This is different from a synthesizer. where the player at least has to understand basic notes and scales.
What's the connection? Neither Beamz nor Microsoft Songsmith actually require any knowledge of music. Worse, they don't promote an understanding of music. Instead, they offer an easy, albeit awful sounding, way out of the problem of having no musical talent. Instead of becoming skilled, you simply let machines do the work for you. That's not what H+ is about. We want music creation to be accessible to more people, but at some point you have to meet traditional music methods halfway, just so you can know what you're doing. I can promise you that someone using Beamz and Songsmith could never come up with anything as catchy as "Wild Thing," let alone anything as groundbreaking as Sgt. Pepper's Lonely Hearts Club Band or Daydream Nation. It's hard to imagine, but someone using these tools may not even be able to come up with something as good as the latest disposable Britney Spears single. And that's truly scary.
P.S. I actually do want to get a Beamz and replace all the pre-recorded sounds with found sounds of glass breaking, babies crying, tires screeching, etc. It may be no better than loading those sounds into a synth, but I feel like the comedic effect of playing them on "Beamz" may be worth it.
P.P.S. Someone quickly pounced on Songsmith's claims by taking David Lee Roth's vocal track from the Van Halen classic of "Running With The Devil" and putting it through the program. The result, dubbed "Running With The Songsmith," can be heard here: http://music.metafilter.com/2943/Runnin-With-The-Songsmith It's actually worse than I would have thought.
Thursday, January 8, 2009
Thummer Update
Mr. Plamondon did mention that he has started a new company, iGetIt! Music, and he plans to develop an application for the iPhone that simulates many of the Thummer functions. More updates on that as they become available.
Until then, I've been looking into the Opal Midi, a unique midi controller from the UK. Each instrument is hand made, and quite interesting. The website for that one is: http://www.theshapeofmusic.com.
Pretty nifty. Also not cheap. But it's on my wish list.
-Daniel
Wednesday, January 7, 2009
You may rock but does this guitar?
OK, let's ignore how godawful and cheesy this following video is and just focus on the product it's selling:
This actually seems like a good idea, yes? Forget playing it with Guitar Hero and Rock Band, because it doesn't look like much fun (and doesn't appear to have a whammy bar?!), but what about the idea of using touch sensitive technologies for fret boards? It would save you from tuning your guitar, although there would need to be a way to set alternate tunings. No broken strings during a show, no steel digging into your fingers. I don't know how it would be for finger picking, but for some straight-ahead power chord rock, it could be useful. The You Rock Guitar has a standard guitar input for plugging directly into an amp, as well as a USB input for plugging into a MIDI sequencer or computer, and works with many existing music programs, such as Garage Band. I'd like to see something that's closer to a fully functional guitar, you know, with knobs and a whammy bar and such, but this could be the first step towards a truly digital guitar. And at $150, it's a pricey video game controller, but a great little toy to fiddle with on the music end.
On the other side of the spectrum, it looks like Gibson is also trying to incorporate digital-age technology into their guitars, with the HD.6X, or the HD Les Paul.It uses a Cat5 cable for plugging directly into digital sources. This baby does a ton, including sending out individual data for each of the six strings. It's all very pro-level and the guitar itself is very nice. You can always switch it to analog for some good old fashioned shredding, should you choose. Of course, quality like this doesn't come cheap, so be prepared to spend $4000 or more. While I like the plethora of recording and output options the HD.6X gives you, it isn't any more intuitive to learn or play than a regular guitar, and has all the normal drawbacks of a regular axe. Not that I'm suggesting that a $150 "You Rock" guitar could ever match a Les Paul, just that at least it's incorporating new technologies to add to the music experience.
Now, I wonder what would happen if we took either of those guitars and circuit bent them...hmm...
-Daniel
Tuesday, January 6, 2009
What's in a lyric?
My hope is that when the music begins to take shape, the right lyrics will pop out. That's not going to stop me from working and trying now, but I have a feeling the music itself will have a big influence on what words eventually make the cut.
-Daniel
Monday, January 5, 2009
Bring me the head of the Thummer man
This instrument seems like a perfect fit for H+. The only problem? It's not in production yet. I sent an email to the address at the Thummer website, came back as undeliverable. Tried to join the mailing list, and it only takes me to an error page. I'm worried that the Thummer is in development hell, to use a film term. I really want to get my hands on one. The CEO of the company does have a blog at http://www.thummer.com/blog/, and I'll leave a comment for him there, because at the moment it seems the only way I can get in touch with him. I'm hoping that even if the Thummer is not making it to the commercial sector, we could at least get a chance to work with a prototype. Heck, I'd even commission one, if that were possible.
So James Plamondon, if you're reading, please contact us at h.plus.music@gmail.com. We like what we see and we want to try your instrument.
If anyone else finds any new instruments they think we should use, please let us know!
-Daniel
This is the day
I tend to rotate towards artists who push boundaries. In the visual arts, I quickly found and fell in love with the Surrealists and other iconoclast groups. In film, the bizarre worlds of David Lynch and David Cronenberg mesmerized me. I suppose it would have only been a matter of time before I found music that was as adventerous, but I must give credit where credit is due. Despite an abiding love of David Bowie, which was already leading me towards Brian Eno, Lou Reed, Iggy Pop, and many more, it was Spencer Owen who introduced me to The Residents. And if it weren't for that, I'm not sure what my musical tastes would be at this point. And The Residents' catalog and commitment to their art are huge inspirations for where I want to go with H+. Their unfailing dedication to experimentation has led to some of the most amazing music I've ever heard. And from them I've learned of so many other fantastic artists, who have only fed my appetite for the new and the experimental. In the same vein, Spencer also gave me my first taste of The Boredoms, the gateway band to Japanese Noise Rock, easily the most interesting musical movement in the world today.
On my end, I can take sole credit for finding out about David Bowie (not too difficult, I know), King Crimson, and Kate Bush. That's not to say these were amazingly obscure artists that no one knew about, simply that I stumbled upon them on my own, and their influence on me has been equally large as those wonderful groups that Spencer still continues to throw my way to this day. I'll admit, I can't remember if I found out about Peter Gabriel all on my lonesome, or if Spencer showed me the way on that one, or if it was something in between.
The main connecting thread between these particular artists is not just that they're great, but they have always pushed their own music forward in unexpected and exciting ways. Too many musicians are content to spend a few years perfecting a style and then working strictly within those limits for the rest of their careers. This does not hold true for the above, who bring something new to the table with every outing. Does that mean everything they touch turns to gold? No, but I'd rather hear their failures from the heart than an immaculately manufactured and packaged success from more comfortable artists.
It would take ten blogs for me to list all the artists I love and who have influenced me, but I specifically chose these because it's this spirit of adventure and innovation that I'm bringing to H+. I get giddy at the thought of working on this project, of turning these ideas swirling in my head into definitive concepts that will have some level of impact on the world. I can't forsee how it will turn out. All I can do is continue to inject the venture with the urge to experiment, to stay restless, never stand still. And, in turn, perhaps I will inspire people as I myself have been inspired.
-Daniel
To all things, a beginning.
Transhumanism is the school of thought that humans can and should use science to transcend the current limitations of the human condition. Despite the initial science fiction images this statement is bound to conjure in your mind, if you take a moment to think about it, using technology to enhance our physical and mental capacities is something we've been doing for millenia. After all, it is our ability to build and use tools that has made us the dominant race on this planet. For a very simple example, I will point out that anyone who uses eyeglasses or contact lenses to improve their eyesight is being technologically enhanced. Transhumanism takes this basic idea a step further, suggesting that the perfectionist ethical imperative for humans to improve their condition can lead to absolute control of evolution through science and technology. This is not limited to using technology to increase our intelligence, strength, or resistance to disease; but could mean new methods of comprehension and senses. Imagine "listening" to a symphony of quantum strings. Imagine experiencing the emotions and sense memories of a friend. Now try and imagine the art created by and such a person. That is H+.
How does this translate into the world of music? Well, the members of H+ (currently Daniel Hirshleifer on vocals and Andy Robinson on percussion) feel that these philosophies are, at their noblest, an extension of humankind's unending search for transendence. Transhumanism represents a bold leap forward, and we want to bring these elements into the world of music. Our plan is to embrace the new and the old together. We want to take existing forms of musical expression (everything from your basic rock/pop milieu to indigenous music to a multitude of cultures) and meld it with new technologies, new ways of looking at music. H+ (literally "Humanity Plus") as a band would look to synthesize the musicians and their audience in ways yet unseen, including giving the audience the ability to help shape the music in some form or fashion. We're looking towards new experimental instruments and technologies to use at the forefront of our music, while still keeping an eye towards tried and true methods. As great as the new may be, there's always something to be said for what has worked before.
This blog is part of the experiment. We are going to use it to keep our audience informed of what we are doing, and the format of a blog, with comments and an open dialogue, will allow for direct communication between musician and audience member. Let us know what you're thinking and what you would like to see. All that we ask is that you keep your comments constructive and intelligent. We will give you the same courtesy.
And so, with that H+ goes, as Peter Gabriel put it, "Out on the air." Stick around and let's discover where this goes together.
-Daniel and Andy, collectively H+